<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox shifting support from extensions to jetpacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.getfirebug.com/2010/01/09/firefox-ending-support-for-extensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.getfirebug.com/2010/01/09/firefox-ending-support-for-extensions/</link>
	<description>Web Development Evolved</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 09:29:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Mozilla preparing to ditch Firefox add-ons as we know them? &#124; Hardware 2.0 &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.getfirebug.com/2010/01/09/firefox-ending-support-for-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Mozilla preparing to ditch Firefox add-ons as we know them? &#124; Hardware 2.0 &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getfirebug.com/?p=565#comment-940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Firefox add-ons.&#8221; And it seems this idea has legs and could very well be set to change how add-ons are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox add-ons.&#8221; And it seems this idea has legs and could very well be set to change how add-ons are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla To Ditch Firefox Extensions? &#124; JetLib News</title>
		<link>http://blog.getfirebug.com/2010/01/09/firefox-ending-support-for-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla To Ditch Firefox Extensions? &#124; JetLib News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getfirebug.com/?p=565#comment-937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] new gadget is bound to replace the powerful extension mechanism we know. Maybe Mozilla wants to replace all the great add-ons we use daily with gadgets that add an entry to the Tools menu, or maybe they just want to draw thousands of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new gadget is bound to replace the powerful extension mechanism we know. Maybe Mozilla wants to replace all the great add-ons we use daily with gadgets that add an entry to the Tools menu, or maybe they just want to draw thousands of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday thought: Please don&#8217;t kill XUL &#171; Snippets code from my daily experience</title>
		<link>http://blog.getfirebug.com/2010/01/09/firefox-ending-support-for-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday thought: Please don&#8217;t kill XUL &#171; Snippets code from my daily experience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getfirebug.com/?p=565#comment-936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8212; dafi @ 3:33 pm   After reading the Mike Connor&#8217;s blog post and the Firebug&#8217;s post blog I realized XUL developers are closer to a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; dafi @ 3:33 pm   After reading the Mike Connor&#8217;s blog post and the Firebug&#8217;s post blog I realized XUL developers are closer to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
